The same $85,000, forty-four different answers
$85,000 is used across this site as a reference salary because it sits close to Australia's full-time median wage. It's the default income the rent affordability calculator starts from, and the salary page runs it against every suburb this site tracks. Under the 30% rule, that income sets a ceiling of $490 a week (see the affordability guide for the full arithmetic). What changes enormously by location is how much of the local market that $490 ceiling actually reaches.
This guide measures that directly: for each of the 44 cities and regions in this dataset, what share of tracked suburbs have a median rent at or under $490 a week. The spread runs from cities where almost nothing qualifies to cities where almost everything does.
Where $85,000 covers most of the market
Sorted from the highest share of suburbs under the $490 ceiling:
| City | Suburbs tracked | Suburbs ≤ $490/wk | Share under ceiling |
|---|---|---|---|
| Armidale | 48 | 48 | 100% |
| Bendigo | 6 | 6 | 100% |
| Tamworth | 30 | 28 | 93% |
| Regional TAS | 18 | 16 | 89% |
| Ballarat | 8 | 7 | 88% |
| Regional VIC | 15 | 13 | 87% |
| Regional SA | 439 | 357 | 81% |
| Launceston | 23 | 18 | 78% |
| Albury | 33 | 25 | 76% |
| Regional QLD | 63 | 46 | 73% |
Regional SA is the standout at scale: 357 of its 439 tracked suburbs sit at or under $490 a week, the largest absolute pool of $85k-affordable suburbs in the dataset by a wide margin. Armidale and Bendigo clear every single suburb they track, though both are small samples: Bendigo has just 6 suburbs tracked in total, so "100%" there means six suburbs, not a broad market. Regional SA's scale is what makes it the more meaningful result: a market this large clearing 81% of its suburbs under the ceiling says something structural about the region, not just a quirk of a small sample.
Where $85,000 barely moves the needle
At the other end, the largest capital markets are where the $490 ceiling reaches almost nothing:
| City | Suburbs tracked | Suburbs ≤ $490/wk | Share under ceiling |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sydney | 599 | 1 | 0.2% |
| Nowra | 140 | 0 | 0% |
| Wollongong | 165 | 0 | 0% |
| Warrnambool | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| Central Coast | 164 | 1 | 0.6% |
| Sunshine Coast | 65 | 2 | 3.1% |
| Gold Coast | 58 | 2 | 3.4% |
| Port Macquarie | 116 | 4 | 3.4% |
| Newcastle | 295 | 11 | 3.7% |
| Melbourne | 168 | 9 | 5.4% |
Sydney is the extreme case among large markets: out of 599 tracked suburbs, exactly one sits under $490 a week. That's not a rounding artefact; it reflects a citywide one-bedroom median of $610, already $120 above the ceiling before accounting for the fact that most suburbs sit above their own city's one-bedroom figure once other bedroom types and dwelling mixes are folded into the all-dwellings median used for this comparison. Wollongong and Nowra both show zero suburbs under the ceiling despite being well outside Sydney itself, which says the $85,000 reference income doesn't travel as far down the NSW coast as it might seem to on paper.
The middle of the distribution
Between those two extremes sits a wide middle band that's easy to miss when only the top and bottom of the list get attention. Wagga Wagga and Regional NSW both land close to 45%, meaning roughly half their tracked suburbs clear the $490 ceiling and half don't, a genuinely mixed market rather than a lopsided one. Bathurst sits at 34%, Hobart at 31%, and Adelaide (despite having the largest absolute number of affordable suburbs outside Regional SA, at 71) only reaches 14% as a share of its 526 tracked suburbs, because Adelaide's total suburb count is large enough that even a big absolute number is a modest fraction of the whole. That distinction between share and count matters: a city can post a low percentage and still be the best practical destination in raw numbers, which is exactly Adelaide's position relative to a small, 100%-clearing city like Bendigo.
The pattern that holds across nearly every city on this list is the same one visible in the top and bottom tables: regional and inland markets clear the $490 ceiling far more often than coastal capital-adjacent markets, even ones that aren't capital cities themselves. Newcastle, Wollongong, the Central Coast and Port Macquarie all sit under 4% despite being regional in the loose sense of "not a state capital", because their proximity to Sydney and the broader NSW coastal commuter belt puts their rents on a similar footing to the city itself, not to genuinely inland regional markets like Wagga Wagga or Regional SA.
Best-value suburbs inside the larger markets
A 0.2% share doesn't mean zero options, just that the options are narrow and worth naming directly. These are the cheapest suburbs with a verified market (30+ recent bond lodgements, so the median reflects a real, active rental market rather than a handful of leases) inside cities large enough that finding an $85k-affordable suburb there is genuinely useful:
| Suburb | City | Median weekly rent | Under $490/wk? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Punchbowl | Sydney | $486 | Yes |
| Bedford Park | Adelaide | $275 | Yes |
| Pennington | Adelaide | $402 | Yes |
| Adelaide | Adelaide | $439 | Yes |
| Brooklyn Park | Adelaide | $480 | Yes |
| Jesmond | Newcastle | $350 | Yes |
| Lambton | Newcastle | $350 | Yes |
| Port Kembla | Wollongong | $520 | No, closest available |
Punchbowl is Sydney's only verified-market suburb under the ceiling, at $486, just $4 of headroom under the $490 limit, which makes it worth knowing by name rather than assuming it doesn't exist. Adelaide, by contrast, offers real choice: four of its ten cheapest verified-market suburbs sit under $490, led by Bedford Park at $275, less than 60% of the ceiling. Newcastle's Jesmond and Lambton both come in $140 under the ceiling. Wollongong is included specifically because it has zero suburbs under $490; Port Kembla at $520 is the closest the city gets, and it still misses by $30, which is a useful contrast against Sydney's Punchbowl clearing the same ceiling by a $4 margin one city over.
What "affordable at $85k" doesn't tell you
A suburb clearing the $490 ceiling on rent alone doesn't mean $85,000 stretches comfortably there once groceries, transport, utilities and insurance are added, so the cost of living calculator runs the full budget, not just the rent line, and it's the better tool for checking whether a specific move actually works financially. It's also worth remembering that a citywide or suburb median describes the middle of the local rental market, not the cheapest unit currently listed, because an individual property could be leased above or below its suburb's own median at any given time. The share-of-suburbs figures in this guide describe where the $85,000 ceiling has room to work with a whole local market, not a guarantee about any one specific lease.
Where this data comes from
Suburb counts and the $490/week ceiling comparison are calculated from quarterly bond-lodgement rent data by city, current as of Q1 2026. The $490 figure itself is derived from the $85,000 reference salary using the standard 30%-of-income formula, not a separately published threshold. Full source-by-source detail is on the sources page; how suburb medians are calculated and matched to cities is on the methodology page.